🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. But no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.